{"id":2338,"date":"2022-02-17T15:50:37","date_gmt":"2022-02-17T12:50:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/?p=2338"},"modified":"2022-02-17T15:50:37","modified_gmt":"2022-02-17T12:50:37","slug":"ars-patent-protected-novo-nordisk-a-ss-interests-in-a-patent-dispute","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/ars-patent-protected-novo-nordisk-a-ss-interests-in-a-patent-dispute\/","title":{"rendered":"ARS-Patent protected Novo Nordisk A\/S\u2019s interests in a patent dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>ARS-Patent represented the interests of Novo Nordisk A\/S in the patent dispute over the Rospatent\u2019s decision on extension of the validity term of a patent related to <em>Insulin degludec<\/em> owned by Novo Nordisk A\/S. Recently, a request of the plaintiff (Geropharm LLC) for the cassation appeal to be considered by the Court Board of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation was rejected. That was the final step of the case.<\/p>\n<p>During the legal proceedings, <a href=\"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/our-team\/attorneys\/kirill-osipov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Kirill Osipov<\/a>, the Head of Legal Department, being the authorized representative of the patentee showed the Court for Intellectual Property Rights, which considered Geropharm\u2019s lawsuit as the first-instance court, that the term for filing such lawsuit as set by Russian law was missed by the plaintiff. In view of arguments and pieces of evidence provided, the Court rejected the lawsuit. The Court\u2019s decision was also upheld by further court instances.<\/p>\n<p>The case was widely discussed in the mass-media.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ARS-Patent represented the interests of Novo Nordisk A\/S in the patent dispute over the Rospatent\u2019s decision on extension of the validity term of a patent related to Insulin degludec owned by Novo Nordisk A\/S. Recently, a request of the plaintiff (Geropharm LLC) for the cassation appeal to be considered by the Court Board of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,19,15],"tags":[29,26,33,28,40,25,32,31,45,30],"post-type":[12],"class_list":["post-2338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-litigation","category-news-and-events","category-patents","tag-court","tag-invention","tag-ip","tag-litigation","tag-osipov","tag-patent","tag-protection","tag-representation","tag-rospatent","tag-win","post-type-news"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2338"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2338\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2339,"href":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2338\/revisions\/2339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2338"},{"taxonomy":"post-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ars-patent.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post-type?post=2338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}